к вопросу о "глобальном потеплении"

[radeprut9]

The grander agenda guides an ancient encompassing effort by conservative anti-capitalist elements within the landed elites of Europe and its satellites. It is vital to this constituency that nothing approaching libertarian economics ever be applied to land or agriculture. They own the immobile investments affixed to the land in and around older built-up metropolitan regions. Their arch-nemesis is the free-booting entrepreneur. They want to tightly police domestic and international markets. The struggle between land and capital over control of the state has been a primary political driver across the West for 400 years. Wind, solar, and biofuels produce energy from the land in and around older metropolitan regions and hence benefit the owners of this land.
Separately, and sadly, Darwall scores poorly on the “Strong Index” – now a standard enviro-movementology metric. The more an author refers to Maurice Strong, the less that author understands environmentalism’s internal power structure. Darwall mentions Strong 51 times! He devotes even more attention to Barbara Ward who died before Global Warming began. Strong and Ward are from among the movement’s clerks and minute-takers. In Darwall’s dramaturgy William Ford; James Goldsmith; Katherine Graham; the Kennedys; the British, Swedish, and Danish Royal families, etc. make mere cameo appearances while publicists and event-planners command centre stage. The height of this folly is when Darwall has billionaire New York Governor Nelson Rockefeller gaining entry into Barbara Ward’s charmed circle. (How thrilled Nelson must have been!) When writers and policy wonks gaze upon Mount Olympus, they perceive a realm of writers and wonks. If triangles had gods, those gods would look like triangles.           http://ecofascism.com/review35.html