climate change

[radeprut9]

‘Warmism’ – the belief that human activities are fuelling catastrophic climate change – has long been slammed as a “neo-fascist quasi-religion”. Those who take a more sceptical view point to the way that warmists cling to statistics, such as the long debunked “97 percent” of scientists who believe in warmism, as though it were religious dogma...

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/03/13/warmists-take-time-out-from-their-jihad-on-carbon-to-depict-sceptics-as-isis-fighters/

A leftist global think-tank alluded to this a few years ago. The Club of Rome proclaimed: “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

One of the luxuries of basing a movement’s argument on quasi-science, including heavily doctored reports and “data,” is that bogeymen can be made of almost anything. And in the case of the AGW alarmists, it’s man, and capitalism. Once mankind is identified as the culprit behind climatic changes, his every activity can be justifiably regulated, controlled, and taxed. And once taxed, an omnipotent government that idyllically “cares” for the collective can redistribute it. And as Figueres and Klein evidence, it can provide the irrational justification for changing the global economic system.
http://sppiblog.org/news/united-nations-admits-climate-change-is-about-undoing-capitalism